The rules and explaination:
http://www.webjam.com/nbc_gawCurrent campaign map situation:
http://napbc.freeforums.org/current-gaw6-situation-t4543.htmlBattle 1
Map Hex 64
Mortier v Graf Bulow.
175ceh v 175ceh
Result Draw/Draw
France lose 30ceh Allies lose 26ceh
Both armies retired.
The French launched a surprise attack on the campaign map, catching the Prussian supported by the British in the North East.
The opening gambit by the French under Mortier went as well as could be expected.
I abandoned the opportunity to capture strategic objectives in this battle in the hope that an attack coming from where least expected would pay dividends later on.
After watching the replay and seeing what the allies had left towards the end of the battle has convinced me this was the right strategy for this battle.
If i had had one more corp, to free up the guard it may have been a good result on the left flank?
The bulk of Mortiers battle group struck east and then north, through a densely forested area of the battlefield. The rain was a god send and the bulk of the troops were able to get into position without being spotted by scouts. A fairly substantial corp under Soult was sent through the centre to take up positions just before some hills that a small Prussian corp held.
This was one of the first battles that i have had for a long while where the French artillery made a good impact on the battlefield, Victors artillery corp especially making a good show, taking up positions repeatedly between two corps in perfect order. Friant with the guard was called upon far to early to cover the right flank of Soult in the centre. The Prussians were quite successful in north on the flank of this corp and with the guard heading there so early, were taken out of the equation for the main attack, but as usual that is the uncertainty of war!
A corp that i had left covering the lops, was also unable to get into the action, but again i was fortunate in that i left it guarding the lops as a free ranging scout caused me a head ache later in the battle by capturing one and trying for the second. The infantry of the this corp were able to drive off the said 'reconnaissance' unit fairly easily.
Macdonald on the extreme left wing had been making steady headway for most of the battle, but was withdrawn in the nick of time once the allied guard cavalry decided to throw in their hand. Suchets attack supported by Davout failed to materialize, which was quite unfortunate as i am convinced after seeing the replay that his fairly fresh corp supported by the weakened Davout may have had a fairly substantial impact on the battle on the left flank.
With the allies now pressing their advantage against my weakened corps, it was decided at about 5 o'clock to go over to the defensive, gone are my days of going for broke, its all about saving troops for next battle.
Generals DJ and Gunners defence was text book, only moving troops when they were needed, but by the looks of the replay i was quite successful in drawing the bulk of their army into the fray, like i have said if i could have had the guard on the left, i may just have been able to break through there and move onto some of the objectives? But then again the allies would have probably moved reinforcements differently to counter their deployment? What i needed was two guard corps
For this battle i only had two regiments of guard cavalry, and the allies had four, from a personal point of view less guard cavalry make for a better battle dont you think?
I will be checking some historical oobs to see how many thousands different nations had when it came to guard cavalry as i am wondering if we have too much with about 4,000 to 6,000 per battle?
http://youtu.be/vV8TZ-wZQdY